Which situation would NOT likely lead to a Fair Housing complaint?

The situation involving a landlord requiring background checks for all applicants is less likely to lead to a Fair Housing complaint because it applies uniformly to all potential tenants, regardless of their race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status, or disability. Fair Housing laws are designed to prevent discriminatory practices, and a blanket policy for background checks can actually serve as a legitimate business practice aimed at ensuring tenant reliability and property safety.

In contrast, favoring long-term tenants could imply preferential treatment that might unintentionally favor some groups over others, potentially raising red flags under Fair Housing laws. Showing properties based on need reflects understanding and accommodation, which is generally appropriate but could be challenged if it results in unequal treatment across protected classes. Refusing to sell to a minority buyer is a clear violation of Fair Housing laws, as it constitutes direct discrimination based on race or ethnicity. Therefore, a policy that is standard for all applicants, like requiring background checks, is in alignment with Fair Housing principles.